inksb wrote:@Bez, what do you do for a living that allows for you to have the time to view 2-3 movies damn near every day?*
*super jealous btw
do you use Letterboxd?
I do not know about Letterboxd.
Sometime I forget what I do for a living. Yesterday was one of those days.
Normally I do not have a lot of time to watch movies. Normally I am very jealous of the amount of movies you and @ScoJo watch. Thankfully normally means that exceptions have to occur.
@ScoJo: nice one. I have not yet seen Il Profumo Della Signora. I do have an Italian 7" of the score.
I have also never seen Someone's Watching Me nor Elvis.
I did finish Sharp Objects last weekend. The last two episodes were great. Any grievances I had in episode 2 - 6 went away when the show was finished (the large amount of super short flashbacks and focus on alcohol).
And I watched Zodiac a couple of day ago, the director's cut. It had been about ten years since I had seen it. And I never had seen the director's cut. I couldn't remember a thing from back then. It was as viewing it for the first time. Not as suspenseful as I had hope.
Is it just me or does the change in pace in movies feel much more dramatic between movies from 2005 versus 2018 then from 1950 to 2005? I do not mind slow movies. I do not remember Jaws to be a slow movie. But the 18-year old in the house stopped watching Jaws because he found it to be too slow (boring?).
Maybe it is not the difference in pace in the last ten years or so (because of higher quality tv-shows?) but more the difference between and 18-year old watching 'old' movies versus a 38-year old watching any movie.
I do remember watching Avengers years ago and that I simply could not follow everything that was going on on the 40" screen. Maybe the answer is a bigger screen.