Hatter313 wrote:Saw a quiet place this afternoon....where “Jim from the office” gets off making such an exceptional film is beyond me haha.
Seriously, do yourselves a favor and see it in theaters, it’s excellent.
I thought it was solid, though I had a number of questions throughout which threw me out of the film's concept/internal logic.
I'll just leave you with this one (*MILD SPOILER*):
-
-
-
-
-
-
When he takes his son to the waterfall. All I could think was - with these critters running around and picking peeps off at the slightest noise, this scene shows that he has of course tested this theory thoroughly before telling his son it's safe. At some point he risked his life trying it out (being the only way to know for sure)??
What guy (with beloved wife and children, relying on him to survive) would even remotely take that initial chance, just to 'blow off steam', with there being
any possibility that ferocious sound-sensitive creatures will descend upon him?
I'd love to hear a rational angle on this, it didn't wash for me. I had other thoughts too, along those lines. Tbf, many things were very well thought out in the flick, although the daughter's 'hearing aid' side effect also smacked to me of 'Signs' plotting ;-)