Talk about films scores here.

Moderators: lazyben, static14, texasvinyl

User avatar
By ScoJo
#155000
I’m curious what people’s thoughts are on the upcoming WW release of Texas Chain Saw Massacre?

Beyond releasing a daft overpriced single track 7” teaser that nobody needs, both the sample track and WWs classically vague/ambiguous wording lead me to deduce it’s audio pulled from the music/fx track of a print. I’m not necessarily averse to that, with such a sought after legacy horror release we all probably agree we’ll take ‘something’ over ‘nothing’, but why not be straight up and clear about it (like the DW 40th anniversary Halloween release for instance).

Thoughts?
Last edited by ScoJo on Wed Nov 06, 2024 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By inksb
#155001
Since it was announced I assumed that is all they were doing. Hasn't it been stated multiple times over the last two decades that the original elements are lost? You would think if they were some how miraculously found it would be THE thing you would be marketing about this release
User avatar
By static14
#155002
In WW's email it says.

"Remastered from the original raw analog recordings by Wayne Bell at Soundcrafter Studio in Austin, TX, the score will finally make its way to vinyl, digital, CD, and cassette in celebration of the iconic film’s 50th Anniversary."

We know WW can be liberal with the truth, but they make it sound like it came from original tapes. Who knows.
User avatar
By ScoJo
#155003
Yeah I saw that @static and would draw the same conclusion. If true, it does make the inclusion of sound effects throughout the released ‘Main Title’ track a somewhat confusing choice?

Or is it the only way to make it make sense as a release to include sfx (and maybe even dialogue, who knows?) since it’s famously not a typical ‘score’ in the traditional sense?
User avatar
By inksb
#155004
"raw analog recordings" is a weirdly broad/indirect term, if it was the original masters why not just say that?
User avatar
By ScoJo
#155005
I’ve compared the WW ‘Main Title’ to the opening of the film itself, and I’m not 100% (for a few reasons) but fairly convinced it’s some kind of re-recording. In a recent interview with Bell he talks about how easy the score was to record and says he can ‘recreate the sounds right now’ in his work space. Dunno - but the released ‘Main Title’ is certainly different enough when A/B compared.
‘Raw analog recordings’ could just simply mean that Bell used the same vintage recording methods as the original.
User avatar
By ScoJo
#155099
I love Humphreys but man, there are some things that just don’t need his ‘supercolourful’ style. What about Phantasm screams ‘bright primary colours’? I honestly just don’t understand these folks.

Definitely excited for unearthed new music as a huge fan, but who needs ANOTHER repress of the og album?! They coulda omitted that and kept it as an affordable 2xlp….


IMG_7949.gif
IMG_7949.gif (241.15 KiB) Viewed 173 times
  • 1
  • 204
  • 205
  • 206
  • 207
  • 208